Guide24 September 202610 min read

A practical CRA readiness path for manufacturers: confirm scope and classification, close Annex I gaps, run vulnerability handling and reporting, and plan conformity assessment and CE marking before December 2027.

Cyber Resilience Act step by step: readiness for manufacturers – Secrato Guides

At a glance

  • The Cyber Resilience Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/2847) sets cybersecurity requirements for hardware and software “products with digital elements” on the EU market. Most obligations apply from 11 December 2027.
  • Reporting of actively exploited vulnerabilities and severe incidents applies from 11 September 2026, including for products already on the market.
  • Classification sets the conformity route. Most products can self-assess, but important class II and critical products need a third party or certification.

This guide is for manufacturers of connected hardware and software, and for the product security, engineering and compliance teams who have to make the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) work. The roles of importers, distributors and open-source stewards are covered too. By the end you will have a confirmed scope and role per product, a classification decision, an Annex I gap analysis, a working vulnerability handling and reporting process, and a plan for documentation, conformity assessment and CE marking.

Applies to
Manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers and distributors of products with digital elements; a light regime for open-source software stewards
Key deadlines
11 June 2026: notified body rules apply. 11 September 2026: reporting obligations apply. 11 December 2027: full application
Reporting channel
ENISA Single Reporting Platform, routed to the coordinating CSIRT of the Member State of your main establishment
Maximum fines
EUR 15 million or 2.5% of worldwide annual turnover for breaches of Annex I or Articles 13 and 14
Time to complete
Reporting readiness: weeks. Full readiness per product line: typically 6–18 months

Before you start

The CRA is product legislation in the CE marking tradition, not an organisational standard like ISO 27001. Compliance is assessed per product. You need a portfolio list that includes software-only products, firmware, companion apps and cloud back ends; a named product security owner (usually a PSIRT lead) with influence over release decisions; and access to architecture diagrams, build pipelines and dependency manifests. The legal text is on EUR-Lex[1], and the Commission publishes guidance and FAQs on its implementation page[3]. For an overview, see our Cyber Resilience Act page.

Step 1: Confirm scope and your role per product

The CRA covers products with digital elements whose intended or reasonably foreseeable use includes a data connection to a device or network, including the remote data processing a product needs to perform its functions. Products covered by specific sector rules, such as medical devices, motor vehicles and civil aviation, are excluded. Standalone SaaS generally falls under NIS2 rather than the CRA.

  • Record per product whether it is in scope, and any exclusion you rely on.
  • Determine your role. A manufacturer develops or has the product developed and markets it under its own name. An importer places a non-EU manufacturer’s product on the EU market. A distributor makes it available further down the chain. An open-source software steward is a legal person that systematically supports free and open-source software intended for commercial activities.
  • Watch for role shifts: an importer or distributor that rebrands or substantially modifies a product takes on manufacturer obligations.
  • List products already on the market. They only face the full requirements if substantially modified after 11 December 2027, but Article 14 reporting applies to them.

Owner: Product compliance lead with legal counsel

Evidence to keep: Scope register with role, rationale and exclusions per product

Common pitfall: Forgetting companion apps and update servers that form part of the product

Step 2: Classify each product

Most products fall in the default category. Annex III lists important products. Class I includes operating systems, browsers, password managers, VPNs, routers, SIEM systems and smart home security products such as door locks and cameras. Class II includes hypervisors and container runtimes, firewalls and intrusion detection or prevention systems, and tamper-resistant microprocessors and microcontrollers. Annex IV lists critical products: hardware devices with security boxes, smart meter gateways, and smartcards and secure elements.

Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392 of 28 November 2025 gives the technical description of each category and entered into force on 21 December 2025[2]. What counts is the product’s core functionality. A product that merely integrates a listed component does not become an important product for that reason alone.

  • Compare each product’s core functionality with the descriptions in the implementing regulation, not only the short labels in the annexes.
  • Write a short rationale per product, especially for borderline cases.

Owner: Product compliance lead with product management

Evidence to keep: Classification decision and rationale per product

Common pitfall: Classifying on marketing language instead of core functionality

Step 3: Assess risk and map the gaps to Annex I

Article 13 requires a cybersecurity risk assessment that informs planning, design, development, production, delivery and maintenance, and that determines how each Annex I requirement applies. Annex I Part I asks, in summary, for products delivered without known exploitable vulnerabilities, with a secure default configuration, with security updates (automatic by default where appropriate), access control, confidentiality and integrity protection, data minimisation, availability, a limited attack surface, incident impact reduction, security logging and secure data removal.

  • Threat-model each product or product family across hardware, firmware, software and back end.
  • For each Annex I requirement, record applicability, how it is met, evidence and remaining gap. Justify anything marked not applicable.

The companion template includes an Annex I checklist covering every Part I and Part II requirement, a classification worksheet and a timeline.

Owner: Product security architect

Evidence to keep: Risk assessment and Annex I gap matrix per product

Common pitfall: Treating the risk assessment as a one-off document

Step 4: Set up vulnerability handling, including an SBOM

Annex I Part II applies for the whole support period. Manufacturers must document components, including a software bill of materials (SBOM) in a common machine-readable format covering at least top-level dependencies; remediate vulnerabilities without delay; test regularly; disclose fixed vulnerabilities; maintain a coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD) policy and a reporting contact; distribute updates securely; and provide security updates free of charge with advisories.

  • Generate SBOMs per build (SPDX or CycloneDX) and store them per release. You do not have to publish them.
  • Set the support period: at least five years unless the product is expected to be used for less, and visible to buyers.
  • Publish a CVD policy and security contact, for example via security.txt, and run a PSIRT intake with triage targets.
  • Report vulnerabilities you find in integrated components, including open-source code, to their maintainers.

Owner: PSIRT lead and engineering lead

Evidence to keep: SBOMs, CVD policy, vulnerability log, published advisories

Common pitfall: An SBOM produced once for an audit that no longer matches what shipped

Step 5: Make reporting work now

Since 11 September 2026, manufacturers must notify every actively exploited vulnerability and every severe incident affecting product security through ENISA’s Single Reporting Platform[4]. The report reaches the coordinating CSIRT of the Member State of the main establishment and ENISA at the same time.

Stage Actively exploited vulnerability Severe incident
Early warning 24 hours after becoming aware 24 hours after becoming aware
Notification 72 hours after becoming aware 72 hours after becoming aware
Final report 14 days after a corrective measure is available One month after the notification
  • Define who decides that a vulnerability is actively exploited, and when the clock starts.
  • Register on the platform and rehearse a submission.
  • Prepare report templates and a process to inform affected users. Our incident reporting playbook aligns CRA reporting with NIS2, DORA and GDPR.

Owner: PSIRT lead with incident response

Evidence to keep: Procedure, platform registration, submitted reports with timestamps

Common pitfall: Assuming reporting only applies to products launched after December 2027

Step 6: Choose the conformity assessment route

Under Article 32, default products may use internal control (module A). Important class I products may use module A only if harmonised standards, common specifications or a certification scheme at level “substantial” have been fully applied; otherwise they need modules B and C or module H with a notified body. Class II products always need a third party. Critical products must use a European cybersecurity certification scheme where a delegated act requires it, otherwise the class II routes. Important free and open-source products may use module A if their technical documentation is public.

  • Track harmonised standards. At the time of writing the Commission plans the first deliverables in 2026 and more in 2027[3].
  • If you need a notified body, book early. Their rules apply from 11 June 2026 and capacity will be tight near December 2027.

Owner: Product compliance lead

Evidence to keep: Route per product, notified body contracts, standards applied

Common pitfall: Planning on module A for class I before standards are cited

Step 7: Compile the technical documentation

Article 31 and Annex VII require documentation covering the product and intended purpose, design and production, the vulnerability handling process, the SBOM, the risk assessment, the support period rationale, standards applied, test reports and the declaration of conformity. Keep it for ten years after placing on the market, or for the support period if longer. Annex II sets the user information, including the vulnerability contact and the end of support.

In Secrato, this step maps to Policy & Evidence Management, where each Annex I control result and its evidence link to the product’s documentation set.

Owner: Product compliance lead with engineering

Evidence to keep: Versioned Annex VII file and Annex II user information

Common pitfall: Documenting the product but not the processes that keep it secure

Step 8: Declare conformity, affix CE marking and maintain

After the assessment, draw up the EU declaration of conformity (Article 28, Annex V) and affix the CE marking (Article 30). For software it may be placed on the declaration or the accompanying website. Compliance continues during the support period: keep handling vulnerabilities, keep each security update available for at least ten years or the remaining support period if longer, and assess whether changes are substantial modifications that need a new assessment.

  • Brief importers and distributors on what they must check before selling.
  • Review the risk assessment and Annex I matrix with every major release, and hold a yearly management review.

Owner: Head of product security

Evidence to keep: Signed declaration, certificates, release reviews

Common pitfall: Losing track of support periods for legacy product lines

Benelux notes

Belgium: The CCB is the national CSIRT and will receive CRA notifications from manufacturers established in Belgium. Check the national designation of CRA market surveillance and notifying authorities at the time of planning.

Netherlands: The draft implementation act (Uitvoeringswet verordening cyberweerbaarheid), consulted in 2025, proposes the Rijksinspectie Digitale Infrastructuur (RDI) as market surveillance authority[5]. Check its parliamentary status.

Luxembourg: The NIS2 law of 5 May 2026 made the ILR the default NIS2 authority[6]. CRA designations are separate, so verify the responsible authority when planning your route.

Free template

CRA readiness checklist (Annex I mapped)

A product-level checklist that maps every Cyber Resilience Act essential requirement in Annex I, plus the manufacturer, reporting, documentation and CE marking obligations, to owners, status and evidence. A classification worksheet and timeline help you plan conformity assessment per product.

Get the template →

How this connects to other frameworks

The CRA regulates the product; NIS2, ISO 27001 and CyFun regulate the organisation. Secure development, vulnerability management, supplier management and incident response under ISO 27001 Annex A or NIS2 Article 21 still provide much of the process evidence the CRA expects. Until harmonised CRA standards exist, IEC 62443-4-1 and 4-2 (industrial) and ETSI EN 303 645 (consumer IoT) are useful references.

Frequently asked questions

Does the CRA apply to products we already sell?

Products placed on the market before 11 December 2027 only need to meet the full requirements if substantially modified afterwards. Article 14 reporting applies to them from 11 September 2026.

Do we have to publish our SBOM?

No. It is part of the technical documentation and must be provided to market surveillance authorities on request.

We only develop open-source software. Are we a manufacturer?

Not necessarily. Open-source software supplied outside a commercial activity is out of scope. A foundation that systematically supports it for commercial use may be a steward, with a lighter regime and no fines. If you monetise the product itself, you are probably a manufacturer.

Is SaaS in scope?

Standalone SaaS generally is not. A cloud back end that a device needs to perform its functions is part of that product.

Sources

  1. EUR-Lex, “Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (Cyber Resilience Act)”, 20 November 2024: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2847/oj/eng
  2. EUR-Lex, “Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/2392 on the technical description of the categories of important and critical products with digital elements”, 28 November 2025: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2025/2392
  3. European Commission, “Cyber Resilience Act – Implementation”, accessed October 2026: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/factpages/cyber-resilience-act-implementation
  4. European Commission, “CRA reporting obligations”, accessed October 2026: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/cra-reporting
  5. Privacy-web.nl, “Internetconsultatie Uitvoeringswet verordening cyberweerbaarheid van start”, March 2025: https://privacy-web.nl/en/nieuws/internetconsultatie-uitvoeringswet-verordening-cyberweerbaarheid-van-start
  6. Elvinger Hoss Prussen, “NIS2 now in force in Luxembourg”, 2026: https://elvingerhoss.lu/insights/publications/nis2-now-force-luxembourg
Secrato